Is the port deal with the United Arab Emirates a wise decision? I wonder how good of a decision it is to allow the UAE(United Arab Emirates) to be the operator of many of our major ports. Even though it seems harmless enough and these people seem like good people. I think we still must be cautious in this; since 96% of the UAE are Muslims, and Muslims have had a long history of violence and Jihad, not to mention the Quran teaches the killing of the Infidels. Even if these people are supposedly not radical Muslim I have a feeling that they sympathize with certain radical Muslim causes such as the destruction of Israel and lets not forget that Jesus came in peace as where Muhammad was a marauder who resorted to raiding caravans, bound for Mecca, to finance his religion. I personally find it outrageous that anyone would consider a marauder a prophet of God; raiding caravans is hardly justifiable as a worthy cause, but rather the practice of a thief. Now that we clearly see the Muslim religion was founded as a religion of violence as opposed to the Christian religion. Early Christians regularly submitted to percussion and suffering and death simply for refusing to sacrifice to the emperor and deny Christ. That is infinitely more honorable than anything that can be said about the prophet Muhammad. Aside from that, we must also be cognisant that only 14 percent of those polled in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) hold a favorable view of the US according the the Arab America Institute(AAI). All this combined with the UAE’s continued support of Hamas and corruption in the port of Dubai, makes it a dangerous thing to allow them to run our major ports especially after so much talk of the ports vulnerability to an attack. We must keep a close eye on what they do with these ports.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)