Haynes.tv

This whole argument that Jesus did not exist as a historic person has gone way too far. So far that now some man by the name of Luigi Cascioli has channelled Enrico Righi in court upon the existence of the historical Jesus. Cascioli even goes so far as to say he has provided proof that Jesus did not exist and was based on some 1st century Jew who fought against the Roman army. On top of this Cascioli now says that Enrico Righi must provide proof that he did exist. That is pretty crazy, especially since we have so much proof that Jesus existed: such as any Western History book, the Bible, Josephus (a Jew historian who wrote about Jesus). What more do we need to prove that there was a real Jesus; a body? Well we obviously will not find a body since He has risen. I just do not understand we never had anyone changeling the Muslims as to whether the prophet Muhammad existed, or the Buddhists as to the existence of lord Buddha, or try to say that Alexander the Great did not exist. Why is that? It is simple it is because their influence was so great that there was no reason you could question the fact that they existed as is such with the influence of the Jesus Christ.

CNN news report on the trial